An elderly man, feeling weak, enters the emergency room of a local hospital. After waiting, a doctor examines him and determines he is severely dehydrated. An IV is placed, and sterile saline solution (water and salt) soon help the man recover. He prepares to leave the hospital and is told to make sure he drinks plenty of water each day. “But they have turned off my water,” he says, looking forlorn. “I live too far from town to walk, and have no car. And now I have no water.”
A couple rents a small home in an unincorporated part of Sonoma Valley not served by Valley of the Moon Water District. Their water has always been provided by a well on the property, but the well has gone dry. Their landlord says he does not have the money to drive a new well. “You are free to buy bottled water,” he tells them, “But as long as you live here you must pay rent.”
A senior citizen who uses a walker, living on a low fixed-income in a small home in the City of Sonoma, finds herself in financial difficulty after an illness. She is late on paying her water bill, and the city turns off her water. Her neighbor lets her run a hose from her house and she fills jugs with water each morning. Once a week her neighbor lets her take a shower in the neighbor’s house, but the neighbor’s home has been sold and she will be moving.
These three situations confront us not only with the technical realities of the availability of water, but also moral issues about the responsibility of society to insure that citizens have access to water. If the CEO of Nestle, an international food corporation which also sells bottled water is correct, access to water is not a right, and water can be privatized just like any other resource. Accordingly, Nestle purchases the water rights of entire foreign villages and exports the water to package it and sell it in plastic bottles. This represents the extremes of water morality, a position which creates “the right to die of thirst.”
Here in Sonoma Valley our water is not privatized – owned and delivered by a private corporation – but is publicly-owned by government. Its operational model, however, is corporate and government appears to have decided that it too will create the right to die of thirst; the only lifeline provided to those who cannot pay for water is the public drinking fountain or the hospital.
While the maintenance and operation of water systems requires money, one logically assume that such costs are best provided by taxpayers, but this is not the case. Notably, water systems cannot be divided from sewage treatment systems; together they represent the full cycle of public water use. Yet sewage treatment systems are taxpayer supported via property taxes, while water supplies and delivery are not. Accordingly, unlike water supplies, sewer access is not “cut off” for non-payment; at worst, a tax lien may be placed on a piece of property.
Water provision and its cost should be property tax-based, not retail-customer-based. Like police, fire and sewage treatment, access to potable water should be a basic right within our society and both ethical and operational realities demand a change in way we provide and finance it.
4 thoughts on “Water Rights and Wrongs”
The ability to have clean water should not be based upon having enough money to pay, neither should access to healthy food, decent living quarters or medical care. We are sliding backwards at a very rapid rate if we continue to deny our fellow citizens basic human rights. Each of us are vulnerable to these situations of lack and should help others that are already there. Anything less is abhorrent,
I agree Julie. The citizens need to push local electeds to move towards a more humanitarian set of policies.
I think you might want to check your facts. Sewer fees aren’t paid by property taxes, rather, I believe that they are paid along with your property tax assessment billing. I don’t think that State law allows property taxes to subsidize utility (water or sewer) rates.
Yes, you are correct. The sewer fees are an assesment collected with the Property Tax payment. As such, however, it is paid by the property owner. I am proposing that water be provided the same way sewer services are provided, and costs passed on to renters if the property is rented. Water service should never be denied due to non-payment; if a renter does not pay rent he or she can be evicted but denial of water is inhumane.